A taxonomy of regulatory and policy matters relevant to psychedelic-assisted therapy in Australia.

OBJECTIVES: The Australian government recently rescheduled psilocybin and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine for limited clinical uses. This change has raised various regulatory concerns and challenges for the field of psychedelic-assisted therapy. To provide clarity, we aimed to comprehensively catalogue the matters relating to psychedelic-assisted therapy that are or could be regulated. METHODS: We conducted a desktop review of the literature and current regulatory sources, semi-structured interviews with professionals who had expertise in fields relating to psychedelic-assisted therapy and a framework analysis to generate a taxonomy of relevant regulatory matters. In relation to each matter, we further identified what type of regulation (if any) currently applies to that matter, any uncertainty as to how the matter should be addressed in clinical practice in the context of current regulation and whether there are conflicting views as to how the matter could or should be further regulated. RESULTS: The taxonomy is structured into six main regulatory domains, three of which have a substantial proportion of matters with uncertainty or conflicting views: Service Establishment, Practitioner, and Treatment Delivery. Key examples of such matters include the location of services and facilities required, which professionals are eligible to become psychedelic therapists, and with what qualifications and experience. Matters in the remaining three domains, Patient Evaluation, Drug Supply and Service Oversight, appear by comparison relatively settled, with regulation either well-established or thought unnecessary. CONCLUSIONS: The taxonomy provides a roadmap for health services establishing and implementing a psychedelic-assisted therapy program, or for government and other policymakers when determining areas that may require further regulation.

Implementation of a ketamine programme for treatment-resistant depression in the public health system: Lessons from the first Australian public hospital clinic.

One could argue that we are living through a period of innovation and change in psychiatry unlike that seen before, with repurposed medications emerging as novel treatments. However, despite evidence of enhanced clinical outcomes and potential medium-term savings, delivering these promising interventions is resource-intensive and perceived as difficult in the public sector. Consequently, they are generally only available in the private sector, often at great cost, effectively making them inaccessible to the 'Have Nots'. The arrival of these paradigm-shifting treatments has inadvertently highlighted a growing mental health inequity. The Royal Prince Alfred Hospital's Ketamine Treatment Clinic was the first public-sector ketamine treatment clinic for complex mood disorders in Australia. Based on 3 years' experience establishing, developing and running a public-sector ketamine treatment service, we review the progress, perils and pitfalls for clinicians and health services contemplating establishing a public-sector ketamine treatment service of their own.

Making sense of narcolepsy: A qualitative exploration of how persons with narcolepsy perceive symptoms and their illness experience.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding how persons with narcolepsy conceptualize symptoms, daily impact and illness experience is key to facilitating dialogue between patients and healthcare professionals. These concepts are usually explored from the perspective of healthcare professionals/researchers and rarely from the perspective of those with narcolepsy. METHODS: 127 self-reported persons with narcolepsy were recruited from an Australian patient support group. A short demographic survey was completed. All agreed to participate in a subsequent 1:1 semi-structured interview. Saturation was reached after 24 interviews (mean age = 33 years (SD 11) with 44% reporting cataplexy). A multidisciplinary team of researchers/clinicians analyzed interview transcripts using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants perceived physical fatigue, sleepiness, and two separate experiences of 'falling asleep/sleep attacks' as distinct symptoms rather than a multidimensional construct (i.e. excessive daytime sleepiness). We also identified two experiences of cataplexy, one triggered by acute emotion and another by a stressor. Participants determined their narcolepsy to be 'well-managed' by the level of functional impairment rather than the frequency of any symptom. Almost all participants described experiencing anticipated stigma and internalized or 'self-' stigma, likely stemming from societal devaluation of sleep and the conflation of sleepiness with laziness. CONCLUSION: Descriptions of common symptoms often differed between participants and the existing literature. These differences likely impact patient-physician communication, with both parties utilizing the same terminology to communicate different concepts. The characterization of stigma in narcolepsy presents opportunities for future research exploring the impact and possible development of interventions to reduce the substantial psychological comorbidity in persons with narcolepsy.

A qualitative exploration of the lived experience of mothers caring for a child with narcolepsy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Parents/carers of a child with narcolepsy (CwN) are often required to become an expert in narcolepsy and navigate healthcare, education, and welfare systems on behalf of their child. Managing pediatric narcolepsy is complex and challenges the child and the entire family, yet few studies have explored carers' experiences. METHODS: Twenty mothers (50% had a CwN <18 years at the time of interview; 85% NT1) participated in a 1:1 semi-structured interview. Participation from fathers was sought; however, none were recruited. A multidisciplinary team of researchers/clinicians analyzed interview transcripts using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Mothers perceived that most people misunderstood the whole-person impact of narcolepsy, including their child's peers, teachers, and support networks. Narcolepsy had a substantial psychological impact on both the child and the whole family, yet was largely unaddressed by healthcare professionals, leaving mothers unsure of where to turn for help. Most parents described negative experiences with their child's specialist, often perceiving the specialists to lack knowledge specific to narcolepsy. Information about illness trajectory and support services was limited or inaccessible, fuelling many mothers' hopes and fears for their child's future. Mothers also frequently described feelings of abandonment by the healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: Our results contextualize the whole-person impact of narcolepsy from the perspective of parents and carers, highlighting the need for proactive inclusion of parents/carers in developing healthcare policy and practice. It calls for developing tools and resources to capture 'well-managed' narcolepsy from the perspective of parents/carers for use in research and clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of a 4-week course of repeated subcutaneous ketamine injections for treatment-resistant depression (KADS study): randomised double-blind active-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Prior trials suggest that intravenous racemic ketamine is a highly effective for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but phase 3 trials of racemic ketamine are needed. AIMS: To assess the acute efficacy and safety of a 4-week course of subcutaneous racemic ketamine in participants with TRD. Trial registration: ACTRN12616001096448 at www.anzctr.org.au. METHOD: This phase 3, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled multicentre trial was conducted at seven mood disorders centres in Australia and New Zealand. Participants received twice-weekly subcutaneous racemic ketamine or midazolam for 4 weeks. Initially, the trial tested fixed-dose ketamine 0.5 mg/kg versus midazolam 0.025 mg/kg (cohort 1). Dosing was revised, after a Data Safety Monitoring Board recommendation, to flexible-dose ketamine 0.5-0.9 mg/kg or midazolam 0.025-0.045 mg/kg, with response-guided dosing increments (cohort 2). The primary outcome was remission (Montgomery-Åsberg Rating Scale for Depression score ≤10) at the end of week 4. RESULTS: The final analysis (those who received at least one treatment) comprised 68 in cohort 1 (fixed-dose), 106 in cohort 2 (flexible-dose). Ketamine was more efficacious than midazolam in cohort 2 (remission rate 19.6% v. 2.0%; OR = 12.1, 95% CI 2.1-69.2, P = 0.005), but not different in cohort 1 (remission rate 6.3% v. 8.8%; OR = 1.3, 95% CI 0.2-8.2, P = 0.76). Ketamine was well tolerated. Acute adverse effects (psychotomimetic, blood pressure increases) resolved within 2 h. CONCLUSIONS: Adequately dosed subcutaneous racemic ketamine was efficacious and safe in treating TRD over a 4-week treatment period. The subcutaneous route is practical and feasible.

Establishing an esketamine clinic in Australia: Practical recommendations and clinical guidance from an expert panel.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) can have severe impacts on function and quality of life. Up to one third of patients will have an inadequate response to their first line of treatment, with subsequent lines of therapy associated with lower remission rates and higher relapse rates. Recently esketamine has become available for Australian patients, and this agent provides an additional treatment option for those with MDD who have had an inadequate response to two or more antidepressant therapies during the current moderate to severe depressive episode. This paper provides an expert panel's practical recommendations and clinical guidance for establishing esketamine clinics in Australia. METHODS: An expert panel (n = 11) comprising psychiatrists, mental health care nurses, pharmacists, and individuals with experience establishing esketamine clinics was convened in Sydney. The panel developed practical recommendations and clinical guidance, which were then further refined. RESULTS: Five key areas were identified: practical considerations for esketamine clinic set-up, including multidisciplinary care considerations; patient selection; administering esketamine; adverse event management and long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Guidance presented in this paper should assist Australian clinicians to set up an esketamine clinic, and provide practical advice on the infrastructure and clinical requirements for treatment of patients with this agent.

A systematic review of the print media representation of ketamine treatments for psychiatric disorders.

BACKGROUND: Public and patient expectations of treatment influence health behaviours and decision-making. AIMS: We aimed to understand how the media has portrayed the therapeutic use of ketamine in psychiatry. METHOD: We systematically searched electronic databases for print and online news articles about ketamine for psychiatric disorders. The top ten UK, USA, Canadian and Australian newspapers by circulation and any trade and consumer magazines indexed in the databases were searched from 2015 to 2020. Article content was quantitatively coded with a framework encompassing treatment indication, descriptions of prior use, references to research, benefits and harms, treatment access and process, patient and professional testimony, tone and factual basis. RESULTS: We found 119 articles, peaking in March 2019 when the United States Food and Drug Administration approved esketamine. Ketamine treatment was portrayed in an extremely positive light (n = 82, 68.9%), with significant contributions of positive testimony from key opinion leaders (e.g. clinicians). Positive research results and ketamine's rapid antidepressant effect (n = 87, 73.1%) were frequently emphasised, with little reference to longer-term safety and efficacy. Side-effects were frequently reported (n = 96, 80.7%), predominantly ketamine's acute psychotomimetic effects and the potential for addiction and misuse, and rarely cardiovascular and bladder effects. Not infrequently, key opinion leaders were quoted as being overly optimistic compared with the existing evidence base. CONCLUSIONS: Information pertinent to patient help-seeking and treatment expectations is being communicated through the media and supported by key opinion leaders, although some quotes go well beyond the evidence base. Clinicians should be aware of this and may need to address their patients' beliefs directly.

Daily activities are associated with non-invasive measures of neuroplasticity in older adults.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the association between daily activities (sleep, sedentary behavior and physical activities) and neuroplasticity in older adults by measuring motor evoked potential amplitudes (MEPs) elicited after a single and spaced continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) paradigm, targeting the primary motor cortex. METHODS: MEPs were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle of 34 older adults (66.9 ± 4.5 years) by delivering single-pulse TMS before, between and at 0, 10, 20, 40 and 60 min after the application of spaced-cTBS separated by 10 min. Habitual activity was assessed by accelerometry for 24 h/day over 7-days. Multiple linear regression models determined if the time-use composition (sleep, sedentary behavior and physical activities) was associated with neuroplasticity response. RESULTS: More physical activity at the equal expense of sleep and sedentary behaviors was associated with greater motor cortical neuroplasticity. Associations appeared to be driven by more time spent in light- but not moderate-to-vigorous- physical activities. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging in light physical activity at the expense of sleep and sedentary behavior was associated with greater LTD-like motor cortex neuroplasticity (as measured with cTBS) in older adults. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest the promotion of physical activity among older adults to support brain neuroplasticity.